Green Bin charges, how did we end up here ?

Like many people in Tamworth I am not happy with the implementation of charging for garden waste to be collected. Yes I did vote for this in full council only a few months ago but this wasn’t a “put your hand up when you’re told we need this” it was in fact the position I had come to after many hours of contemplation and thought right up until just before the council meeting began. I thought that now the charge is imminent I’d share my thought processes.

Before I do I will just list a couple of facts about the charge.
1, the fee is £36 and this covers the calendar year regardless of when you pay within the next twelve months the renewal/repayment date will be December 2018 for 2019. So if you pay in June you get 6 months not 12.
2, it’s an annual fee, £36 for the year (not per collection as some have thought)
3, no one has to pay, if you don’t use your green bin you don’t pay.
4, the green bin service will cost around £250kpa extra due to changes to credits, it’s expected council will collect around £500kpa from the charges and I’ll pick up on what happens to the excess later.

So as I said I thought about this a lot and where did we come from to get here.
When I grew up we had metal dustbin about 90l capacity and a separate lid, everything could go in here including ashes from the fire in the lounge ( I wonder how we didn’t lose the lids?), then a Councillor by the name of John Garner came along and we moved into a privatised system with big black wheely Bins, Eventthing went on but not got ashes, and these were emptied weekly,
Back in 2004 the then labour  council introduced a recycling scheme where black bins were empties fortnightly, dry recyclate was sorted curbside (in blue boxes and we did lose lids) and in Tamworth the green bin was born for garden waste and emptied fortnightly. Contract was signed for a July implementation at the May election there was a change of political leadership and the Conservatives were left as my neighbour at the time put it “getting the blame for something that’s not your fault”. Gosh remember the litter from curbside when the wind blew. This was also the time that John Garner came back on charge of waste management in Tamworth.

John like many of he conservative group was not happy with the fortnightly food waste collection and the curbside recycling methods, with John’s passion we had all sorts of presentations for invessel composting and the like where the council would buy the machinery and then sell the compost product afterwards. The financial return simply didn’t add up to cover the investment in the machinery. Ooh looks like someone has now recycled this idea and is claiming it as their own!!!! It didn’t stack up back then.

Anyway John found a solution and we moved to foodwaste in Black Bins and green, at last weekly food waste collections, but it was costing a fortune. John also lead us in creating the joint service with our neighbours in Lichfield, this was a cheaper service than external providers could supply and saw the end of the blue boxes from pre conservative days, we now had three big wheels Bins green black and blue. I remember these negotiations and remember the fight to keep the lichfield approach of charging for a second garden waste bin out of Tamworth.
In the history I’ve explained above the council had managed to negotiate actual millions of pounds worth of savings in the service and maintained the costs within everyone’s council tax bill.

This brings us to where we are now.
The costs of running services continues to increase as demand for different types of service increase and with the backdrop of reducing government hand outs to councils some difficult decisions have to be made. When I talk about increased demand I wan things like homelessness prevention and adult social care.
As I mentioned above changes to recycling credits will increase costs of the green bin service by around £200-£250k a year and is currently paid for by council tax contributions. Whether you use the green bin or not whether you live in a house of a flat your council tax is paying for those who use the garden waste collection service.
The council is expecting to generate around £500kpa from the charges, so half the charge pays for the service and generates a ‘saving’ in council tax expenditure and a the rest of the income will be used to support other vital service that we need to grow to support the vulnerable. There’s also some complex stuff about recycling credits in the coatings and surplus but the headline figures are about there.

So as ever where does the council get cash from? £80m budget with council tax income of £3.5m, it’s got to come from somewhere so things like industrial unit rents, non domestic rates contribution (after all other agencies have their cuts) car parks and charging for services, and this is where the decision came from. The collection of garden waste is not a statutory service and is therefore optional, the council have a number of options with it including continue as we are, cease the service, charge for it etc etc, in the same way the council charges for other services.

Wow that’s made it sound simple :(  I’m still not happy we’re going down this line but what are the other options? Savings into the hundreds of thousands have been built into the budget over the years and will be again this year, underspends will be made and rolled back into the next year, gone are the days of “have budget will spend before year end”. I don’t want to see any vital services reduced to support new pressures, so whilst I’m not happy with the green waste charges I realise something has to give somewhere.

So it’s a green bin and £36 bill for me, unless I share it with a neighbour and spend £18 each.




Written on my phone not spell or grammar checked yet

22/03 Terror in broad daylight

In this blog I am going to try to look at the act of terrorism and also respond to a thought provoking tweet I received today.

Yesterday we witnessed a man deliberately driving along a footpath mowing people down, crashed the car, ran towards parliament and stabbing a police officer. As I write this 4 people have been killed, 4 families have lost someone and many more affected in this incident. Innocent people going about their daily business.

Praise, Thanks, Thoughts and Prayers  go out the family and friends of Keith Palmer and the others who died yesterday. And also to all Emergency services, members of the public and Tobias Elwood who all selflessly stayed on the front line and tried to help the injured.

Earlier I was listening girl Brendan Cox, who lost his wife in a terror attack last summer, whilst I can't directly quote him, his point was we see people in isolation often characterised by their profession but everyone has a back story they are a father mother sister brother etc. what I would say about profession and isolation there of is that some people go to work to just earn money others go to work not only for a wage but because they believe in what they do.

 I going to quickly refer to the tweet I was in copy yesterday.

   that's the story? . Police officer and 2 others dead but mp locked in is the story!!!

I have now had more information about this tweet and I have clearly Miss understood, the point was about attempts to create s local story and not as I'd assumed. please scroll to the end for update

 I suppose it depends what eyes you are looking through. I've included above my narrative on what i saw through the media, but as for the story, I saw something bigger than whats suggested in the tweet. so I'm going to split this into 2 parts.
    Part 1 an individual caused a number of incidents which triggered a Blue Light response, Their role includes protection of all and our way of life, cordons were put in place and then the area cleared. The area being cleared included a building with over 1000 people in some were emergency services some were administrators, visitors, researchers, MP's, Business people, managers even school children so in light of the situation just outside the building the last thing emergency services need is all these people spilling out into danger or endangering those already caught up in the incident and so lock down the building. Its not only safer for them its also a potentially large problem that can be dealt with later. I fully believe the emergency services did the right thing.
    Part 2 Yes that group of people included MP's. Now in the UK we have a hatred of MP's and a feeling that these people aren't worthy of protection. MP's work really hard to try and improve the Uk or manage particular problems, despite common belief these people work very long hours and put in a great deal of effort. I know Tamworth MP not only increased the number of hours he worked but also took a pay cut when leaving his job to be an MP.
Not one politician that I know is there to cause any harm or distress to anyone they are there for the right reasons the issues become clouded when it comes to priorities and the public purse.
  Despite the above, we have the right to elect and MP to represent our needs and so I do believe they should be protected as should the public and international visitors who walk around London and enjoy the freedom our democracy and services provide for us.


The Uk is no stranger to Terrorism

Wikipedia has a great page listing attacks since 1970

I remember as many of us do some of the troubles we have had, I was in Brighton when the Grand Hotel was bombed, I visited London the week after the 7/7 bombings, i remember reading about the soldiers being shot at Lichfield station.
This week we heard of the death of Martin McGuiness a few years a go we saw tributes following the death of Nelson Mandela and now we are focused on the group who attempt to hide behind Islam. for me it doesn't matter what the cause, it doesn't matter whether its instructed, lone wolf or someone just pushed over the edge. Anyone who creates fear, panic and ultimately injury and death is acting in a terrorist manner, they are terrorising other people.
The above named people moved away from violence and began to negotiate, it was only at that stage that they made progress, (I know there is a whole debate as to who called who terrorists with these)
It has been said a number times but its still true we must not give in to terrorism.

And we must not punish the innocent in the way that terrorist are trying to, we must not let ourselves be consumed by the hatred.
An Irish man I know had his vehicle vandalised repeatedly in the 1974's following the Birmingham pub bombings, it had nothing to do with him. The Muslim community talking their children to school today should not be judged because this guy in London may have been inspired by a terrorist group using their religion.


Again, a massive thank you to all who protect us and they way we live in the UK.

The tweet I referenced at the top was about the localisation of a story and the reference to the local MP not as I interpreted it. I do have to agree with the tweet in regards to the fact that this terrible incident is terrible regardless of whether it has a local angle.

School Run and the reliance on the car

picture found on google search

   It doesn't matter what time of year it is the school run is stressful and blocks roads and footpaths, any professional driver will tell you the roads are so much clearer during school holidays than they are during term time.

Whats the problem and whats the solution ?
  If only it were that simple,

Lets start with the problem.
Parents taking their children to school, all at the same time using the car because they believe it's quicker and more comfortable than alternatives. Combined with not enough room and parking to accommodate all the vehicles and boom that's where we are now.

So lets look at each element of "the Problem" and either address or make sense of it.

1, Numbers
Firstly there are literally thousands of children going to school each and every day, quickly looking at Tamworth. 26 Primary schools with about 150 pupils in each plus 5 high schools with 1000 pupils and a 2 colleges, All these figures are based on nothing but my guesswork. So around 8900-10000 pupils or children moving each day between 7:45 and 9am and again between 3:00 and 4:30  WOW
maybe I should look at those figures again.but that is a lot and they need to get from home to school in a limited time.

2, Parental choice,

"Parents have a right to express a preference for a particular state school, and all schools (except grammar schools) must offer a place to every child who has applied if they have enough places.  But where schools are oversubscribed, the school admission authority (the local authority or the school governing body, depending on the type of school) must use over subscription criteria to determine admissions in accordance with the recently strengthened School Admissions Code."

Whilst there are positives to this policy just like taking a pill there will be side effects. One of these side effects is that the parents of children living "out of catchment" can quite rightly choose to send their children to a school of their choice based on whatever reason they choose such as family, they went there, friends, hearsay performance or absolutely what ever reason they want. The problem that this causes is that the child will then need to travel to said school and due to living "out of catchment" this will mean a distance that could well involve a motorised vehicle.

3, Working Parents
  More and more in today's world financial commitments is shared and families have 2 working parents. this changes things slightly with the school run. Assuming the parents have been able to find part time work or their shifts permit one of them can take the child to school and one could pick them up. This means the school run is no longer a stand alone task but can actually be a stop off point on the way to or from work, evidence of this can be seen with many parents in works uniform or logo'd clothing.

4, School age
  Many schools are still housed in the Victorian buildings that were built in the middle of villages which have been consumed by the urban sprawl . Or they late 1960's and 1970's, all of which were times when cars were not only a luxury but also a relative rarity. This means just like many housing developments of the same age they were built without the capacity for parking that we now.

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION

Well back in 2000,2001&2002 I was an opposition councillor for Belgrave and was invited along with a select group of local residents,councillors,head teachers and staff to attend a "safe routes to school" local committee because Birds Bush, St Gabriel's and Lakeside had been picked for the latest round of funding. I wont go into all the details but I will tell you about how my suggestion was thrown out.

  Birds Bush road in Tamworth is a estate loop road with wide grass verges and footpaths either side, along this loop there is a high school and a primary with nursery (that used to have a goat).

   I suggested that due to the daily congestion and parking issues take advantage of the wide verges and create parking bays either side of the road to allow parents to park safely without blocking the carriageway and therefore make it a safer place, the answers I got still astound me.

   "No we can't do that. The government policy (at the time) for safe routes to school is that any grant funding spent should be used to slow traffic down and discourage people using the car, your scheme will allow traffic to flow at speed and make it easier for people to use their cars"

And being in opposition at the time I quickly lost the debate. I still think I was right but we got speed humps

So what do we do?

• I Walk my children to school, 1.4mile round trip, more of us should if we can, it less stressful. and good for exercise and mental health. 
• Remember our highway code. Do not park on the foot path. Stop at a zebra crossing when people are waiting whether or not there is a crossing person there.
• Don't offload the most important thing in the world ,your child, into a live lane. Use the nearside door and let your child out onto a path or verge. 
• Planning committees etc when considering school building applications should ensure that drop of points are included and become a standard for new schools along with fire sprinklers. 
• Councils need to do more when planning schools in new developments, future proof the access routes.
• Just be considerate to others including residents and other parents and be polite it costs nothing

Whilst walking home from school with my 8 year old recently we talked about the number of cars on the route and we noted that including his school there are 3 in the area. My son asked the simple question "why don't the schools all have different start times half an hour apart?" this was followed with "my school can start at 10 so I get a lie in!"

I do wonder what appetite would be for local park and rides, such as park at Morrison's for a shuttle bus to the Belgrave schools, Wilnecote co-op for shuttle bus to Wilnecote and Dosthill schools etc etc. 

picture found on google search

Tamworth council budget 2017, oh and there is a new play area in there

Another year and another budget is presented to full council, this is my 17th year here but once I left the meeting due to sickness and missed the vote.This year feels a little different, this years budget is a growth budget! And is happening at a time when other authorities are announcing reductions to services.
Just for information Tamworth has a council of 30 members and the vote on the budget went 19 for 1 against so a clear majority of 95% in favour of the budget. (I believe I counted correctly). This in itself is unusual and before people jump up and down about abstentions I have a clear view if you have abstained you haven't voted, you are elected to make a decision abstaining is not a decision.
The meeting was also very positive and for the first time in years I chose not to speak and influence the vote, this was mainly because with the exception of a few niggly points there were no real arguments for or against.

So on to the budget,

• it balances for the 3 year term and sees a council tax increase of £3.87 per year for the majority of Tamworth residents, whilst some could see an increase of £5 per year going to Tamworth Borough Council, (any other increases are for other public services)
• £50m investment in housing including investment in new social housing regenerating tinkers green and the Kerria centre.
• Savings/Income targets for green waste being reviewed an included, (more on this when I have details but we all know who voted for the savings, its the detail that was not in the report).
• £60k spend available for a play area. 

There's loads more in there (click here for the report) but I wanted to highlight the play area.

It was only a few days before this budget was passed that I read the BBC/LGA article warning of play areas falling into disrepair and being closed. And this reminded me of something I was involved with in 2003/4. As councillors the late Jerry Pinner and my self visited all the play areas in Tamworth logging and taking pictures of the state of the play areas in Tamworth which at the time had suffered from neglect and had items removed leaving steel stumps in the ground. We took this back to the council and began to put pressure on for play areas to be invested in.
It was long after this that we became part of the leading group at the council and immediately set about reviewing the situation. The decision was made to build new play areas and support them with repair funding, A policy on play was developed by a scrutiny committee chaired by Danny Cook and taken to cabinet paving the way for 3 strategic play areas, Wiggington park, Castle grounds and Dosthill park. there were also recommendations for a few smaller play areas in other areas to serve local communities but not the number we saw when the estates were built.

Photo borrowed/stolen from http://www.tamworthcastle.co.uk/castle-grounds 

So Tamworth received a £250,000 new play area in the castle ground and as councillors we were lambasted by a minority, mostly about design. albeit at the time one of the best play areas in the area. Wigginton Park and Dosthill park had smaller investments but also had climbing rocks etc for slightly older youths. It was all about diversionary activity. If we can get teens to sit on the climbing rocks and do what teens do then they aren't doing it on the swings. I personally think we should have more swings all over the place, they are like benches but more fun for all ages. whilst on the subject lets not forget about the partnership work moving and improving the skate park

The key for me is informal diversionary activities, This is what I wrote about late last year (follow this link) http://jeremysnewsthoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/ninefoot-park-place-to-play-idea.html
I know realise that entry could do with more info. We have an opportunity here to get this play funding spent in a really good way to divert some of the irritations that young people bring. There is nothing worse than a kid kicking a ball against a garage door, they are only doing it because there is no one else out playing and on your own the ball just doesn't come back and its boring.

So that's my ideas for a play area to serve Belgrave and Wilnecote (and my street as it happens).

But as an aside, does anyone remember the radio controlled car track we had on Robeys lane, I wonder what the market demand would be like for something like that in a couple of places in Tamworth, its only takes a bit of concrete and landscaping.(blog on potholes to follow don't worry) This could be like the BMX track, used formally and informally.